Mitsubishi ASX 2017 vs Opel Crossland 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 197 NM | 254 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 50 HP more power than Opel Crossland, but torque is 57 NM less than Opel Crossland. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 3.6 | |
|
The Opel Crossland is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi ASX consumes 4.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Crossland, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 615 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| Opel Crossland gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4008 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Opel Crossland engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.61 m | |
| Mitsubishi ASX is 8 cm longer than the Opel Crossland, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1255 litres | |
|
Opel Crossland has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi ASX has 26 litres less trunk space than the Opel Crossland. This could mean that the Mitsubishi ASX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Crossland (by 36 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.6 metres less than that of the Opel Crossland, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Crossland has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Opel Crossland has
| |