Mitsubishi ASX 2017 vs Seat Ateca 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mitsubishi ASX) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Seat Ateca) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Seat Ateca is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 33 HP less power than Seat Ateca, whereas torque is 186 NM less than Seat Ateca. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.60 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi ASX is 4 cm shorter than the Seat Ateca, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 126 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.2 metres less than that of the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Ateca has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 19 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Seat Ateca has
| |