Mitsubishi ASX 2017 vs Renault Captur 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Renault Captur is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 33 HP less power than Renault Captur, whereas torque is 96 NM less than Renault Captur. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.4 | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Renault Captur engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.57 m | |
| Mitsubishi ASX is 17 cm longer than the Renault Captur, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 309 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1235 litres | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has 75 litres more trunk space than the Renault Captur. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Captur (by 16 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Captur. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi ASX has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Renault Captur has
| |