Mitsubishi ASX 2017 vs Opel Crossland 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 81 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 36 HP more power than Opel Crossland, whereas torque is 36 NM more than Opel Crossland. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Crossland, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 150 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Crossland. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C1, Peugeot 2008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Crossland might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.61 m | |
| Mitsubishi ASX is 8 cm longer than the Opel Crossland, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1255 litres | |
|
Opel Crossland has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi ASX has 26 litres less trunk space than the Opel Crossland. This could mean that the Mitsubishi ASX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Crossland (by 36 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.6 metres less than that of the Opel Crossland, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Crossland has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Opel Crossland has
| |