Mitsubishi ASX 2016 vs Honda CR-V 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 197 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi ASX and Honda CR-V have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi ASX torque is 7 NM more than Honda CR-V. Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.9 | |
| Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4008 | Used also on Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi ASX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 31 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 205 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 450 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 1.1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |