Mitsubishi ASX 2016 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 197 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 6 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 3 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.5 | |
| Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4008 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Serena | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi ASX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 35 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 113 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |