Mitsubishi ASX 2016 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012

 
Mitsubishi ASX
2016 - 2017
Mitsubishi ASX
2012 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 197 NM197 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.7 seconds11.9 seconds
Mitsubishi ASX 2016 and Mitsubishi ASX 2012 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mitsubishi ASX 2016 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.78.1
The Mitsubishi ASX 2016 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi ASX 2016 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX 2012, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX 2016 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
890 km on highway880 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Engine production duration: 19 years19 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.30 m4.30 m
Width: 1.77 m1.77 m
Height: 1.63 m1.63 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi ASX 2016 and Mitsubishi ASX 2012 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 384 litres384 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1219 litres1219 litres
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`9701`970
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

high
Average price (€): 11 00011 000
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi ASX has
  • lower fuel consumption
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv