Mitsubishi ASX 2016 vs Honda HR-V 2015

 
Mitsubishi ASX
2016 - 2017
Honda HR-V
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP140 HP
Torque: 197 NM172 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.7 secondsn/a seconds
Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 10 HP more power than Honda HR-V, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Honda HR-V.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.78.1
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle610 km in combined cycle
890 km on highway660 km on highway
Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.30 m4.30 m
Width: 1.77 m1.77 m
Height: 1.63 m1.61 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi ASX and Honda HR-V are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 384 litres431 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1219 litres1456 litres
Honda HR-V has more luggage space.
Mitsubishi ASX has 47 litres less trunk space than the Honda HR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda HR-V (by 237 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda HR-V, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`970no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
high
no data
Average price (€): 13 20016 600
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi ASX has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Honda HR-V has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv