Mitsubishi ASX 2016 vs Dacia Duster 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 197 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 35 HP more power than Dacia Duster, whereas torque is 41 NM more than Dacia Duster. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.0 | |
|
The Dacia Duster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4008 | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Clio | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Duster might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 5 cm shorter than the Dacia Duster, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 445 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1444 litres | |
|
Dacia Duster has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 61 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Duster. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Duster (by 225 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.4 metres more than that of the Dacia Duster, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 1`809 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Duster has serious deffects in 210 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Dacia Duster has
| |