Mitsubishi ASX 2016 vs Honda CR-V 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 33 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 36 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Mitsubishi ASX 2016 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 31 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1669 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 205 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 450 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 1.3 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |