Mitsubishi ASX 2016 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Toyota C-HR is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 5 HP less power than Toyota C-HR, but torque is 12 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 3.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota C-HR engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 15 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota C-HR engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi ASX is 7 cm shorter than the Toyota C-HR, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | no data | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi ASX has 7 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. The Toyota C-HR may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota C-HR, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 19 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |