Mitsubishi ASX 2016 vs Suzuki SX4 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 111 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Suzuki SX4 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 6 HP more power than Suzuki SX4, but torque is 16 NM less than Suzuki SX4. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.0 | |
|
The Suzuki SX4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Mitsubishi ASX 2016 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Swift | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller, but slightly higher. Mitsubishi ASX and Suzuki SX4 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1269 litres | |
|
Suzuki SX4 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 46 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki SX4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki SX4 (by 50 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki SX4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki SX4 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Suzuki SX4 has
| |