Mitsubishi ASX 2016 vs Mini Countryman 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Mini Countryman is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 19 HP less power than Mini Countryman, whereas torque is 66 NM less than Mini Countryman. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.5 | |
|
The Mini Countryman is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mini Countryman, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Mitsubishi ASX 2016 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi ASX and Mini Countryman are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1390 litres | |
|
Mini Countryman has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 66 litres less trunk space than the Mini Countryman. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mini Countryman (by 171 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mini Countryman, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mini Countryman has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Mini Countryman has
| |