Mitsubishi ASX 2016 vs Honda HR-V 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 23 HP less power than Honda HR-V, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Honda HR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Mitsubishi ASX 2016 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi ASX and Honda HR-V are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 431 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1456 litres | |
|
Honda HR-V has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 47 litres less trunk space than the Honda HR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda HR-V (by 237 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda HR-V, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Honda HR-V has
| |