Mitsubishi ASX 2016 vs Honda HR-V 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Honda HR-V is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 13 HP less power than Honda HR-V, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Honda HR-V. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.6 | |
|
The Honda HR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Mitsubishi ASX 2016 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 11 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi ASX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi ASX and Honda HR-V are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 431 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1456 litres | |
|
Honda HR-V has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 47 litres less trunk space than the Honda HR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda HR-V (by 237 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda HR-V, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Honda HR-V has
| |