Mitsubishi ASX 2010 vs Opel Mokka 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 2 HP more power than Opel Mokka, but torque is 1 NM less than Opel Mokka. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Mokka engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Opel Astra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Mokka might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.66 m | |
| Mitsubishi ASX is 2 cm longer than the Opel Mokka, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1372 litres | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has 63 litres more trunk space than the Opel Mokka. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Mokka (by 153 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.2 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`959 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Opel Mokka scores higher in safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Mokka, so Mitsubishi ASX quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |