Mitsubishi ASX 2010 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 33 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 38 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2007: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 23 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 955 litres | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has 137 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi ASX (by 264 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 1.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |