Mitsubishi ASX 2010 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 123 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mitsubishi ASX 2010 1.6 engine: The Mitsubishi 4A92 is a 1.6-liter inline four-cylinder engine with a timing chain, known primarily for its low fuel consumption and relatively simple construction. It is widely used in models such as the Lancer and ASX. While the engine is fairly economical and inexpensive to maintain, it also has ... More about Mitsubishi ASX 2010 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |