Mitsubishi ASX 2010 vs Hyundai ix35 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 164 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 18 HP less power than Hyundai ix35, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Hyundai ix35. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai ix35 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai ix35 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai ix35 2009 1.6 engine: The engine is generally a reliable design and not particularly sensitive to fuel quality. However, it is prone to several common issues. One of the most widespread problems is the rapid buildup of carbon ... More about Hyundai ix35 2009 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 12 cm shorter than the Hyundai ix35, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1436 litres | |
|
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 172 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix35. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai ix35 (by 217 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai ix35 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai ix35 has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Hyundai ix35 has
| |