Mitsubishi ASX 2010 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Tucson is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 24 HP less power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Hyundai Tucson. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 400'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai Tucson engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine with a large resource. Can have inherent vibrations and is noisier than a typical petrol engine. Spare parts widely available. May have problems with ignition system and temperature ... More about Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 3 cm shorter than the Hyundai Tucson, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 644 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 225 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 195 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |