Mitsubishi ASX 2010 vs Hyundai Tucson 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 176 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 228 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 59 HP less power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 74 NM less than Hyundai Tucson. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 9.4 | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi ASX consumes 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 510 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai Tucson engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Kia Sorento | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hyundai Tucson 2009 2.4 engine: Generally reliable and easy to maintain engine, with spare parts available. The engine is not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Although the manufacturer does not specify a chain change interval, it ... More about Hyundai Tucson 2009 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 10 cm shorter than the Hyundai Tucson, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 728 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1580 litres | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 309 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Tucson (by 361 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 195 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |