Mitsubishi ASX 2012 vs Toyota RAV4 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 177 NM | 198 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 18 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.5 | |
| Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2010: It has proactive automatic all-wheel drive and acts as front-wheel drive under normal conditions. In the event of wheel slip, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. The clutch can also be locked manually using a button on the console. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 195 mm (7.7 inches) | 191 mm (7.5 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Lancer | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Lexus NX, Toyota C-HR | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 7 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 384 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1752 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 202 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 533 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Toyota RAV4, so Mitsubishi ASX quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |