Mitsubishi ASX 2012 vs Suzuki SX4 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 3 HP less power than Suzuki SX4, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Suzuki SX4. Despite less power, Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi ASX 2012 1.6 engine: The Mitsubishi 4A92 is a 1.6-liter inline four-cylinder engine with a timing chain, known primarily for its low fuel consumption and relatively simple construction. It is widely used in models such as the Lancer and ASX. While the engine is fairly economical and inexpensive to maintain, it also has ... More about Mitsubishi ASX 2012 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.58 m | |
| Mitsubishi ASX and Suzuki SX4 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1269 litres | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has 12 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki SX4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki SX4 (by 50 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki SX4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki SX4 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Suzuki SX4 has
| |