Mitsubishi ASX 2012 vs Suzuki SX4 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Suzuki SX4 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi ASX and Suzuki SX4 have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi ASX torque is 2 NM less than Suzuki SX4. Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi ASX could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki SX4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Suzuki SX4 2013 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.59 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi ASX and Suzuki SX4 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1269 litres | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has 12 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki SX4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki SX4 (by 50 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki SX4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`740 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki SX4 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Suzuki SX4 has
| |