Mitsubishi ASX 2012 vs Chevrolet Trax 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi ASX engine produces 2 HP more power than Chevrolet Trax, but torque is 1 NM less than Chevrolet Trax. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi ASX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi ASX consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi ASX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Aveo, Chevrolet Cruze | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Mitsubishi ASX 2012 1.6 engine: The Mitsubishi 4A92 is a 1.6-liter inline four-cylinder engine with a timing chain, known primarily for its low fuel consumption and relatively simple construction. It is widely used in models such as the Lancer and ASX. While the engine is fairly economical and inexpensive to maintain, it also has ... More about Mitsubishi ASX 2012 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.67 m | |
| Mitsubishi ASX is 5 cm longer than the Chevrolet Trax, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi ASX has 86 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`791 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Chevrolet Trax has
| |