Mitsubishi ASX 2023 vs Hyundai Kona 2020
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi ASX is available only with front wheel drive, while Hyundai Kona can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.6 (petrol, hybrid) | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, electric) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mitsubishi ASX is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 91 - 158 HP | 105 - 280 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 - 270 NM | 147 - 395 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 14 seconds | 5.5 - 11.9 seconds | |
| In general, Hyundai Kona are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mitsubishi ASX. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.4 - 6.2 | 5.1 - 6.1 | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Kona. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 166 - 174 mm (6.5 - 6.9 inches) | 158 - 170 mm (6.2 - 6.7 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi ASX is 2 cm longer than the Hyundai Kona, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 422 litres | 544 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1275 litres | 1297 litres | |
|
Hyundai Kona has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mitsubishi ASX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Kona (by 22 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.5 metres more than that of the Hyundai Kona, which means Mitsubishi ASX can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`865 kg | ~ 1`915 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`385 kg | ~ 1`433 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 480 kg | ~ 482 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 19 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Hyundai Kona has
| |