Mitsubishi ASX 2019 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Skoda Karoq is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 - 150 HP | 115 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 - 197 NM | 200 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 11.7 seconds | 7.8 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 7.7 | 4.5 - 5.3 | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Karoq. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller, but slightly higher. Mitsubishi ASX is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Karoq, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1206 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 115 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`945 | ~ 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |