Mitsubishi ASX 2019 vs Mazda CX-3 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 - 150 HP | 115 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 - 197 NM | 195 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 11.7 seconds | 8.8 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 7.7 | 4.4 - 7.0 | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is larger. Mitsubishi ASX is 9 cm longer than the Mazda CX-3, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1206 litres | 1260 litres | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has 56 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-3 (by 54 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`945 | ~ 1`765 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 15 600 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |