Mitsubishi ASX 2016 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.3 | 1.2 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 - 150 HP | 110 - 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 - 360 NM | 165 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 - 11.7 seconds | 8.9 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 7.7 | 3.8 - 5.8 | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Qashqai. On average, Mitsubishi ASX equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 180 - 190 mm (7.1 - 7.5 inches) | 180 - 182 mm (7.1 - 7.2 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.59 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi ASX is 6 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1219 litres | 1598 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.1 metres less than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`972 kg | ~ 1`953 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`380 kg | ~ 1`390 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 592 kg | ~ 563 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |