Mitsubishi ASX 2010 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 - 150 HP | 103 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 - 300 NM | 156 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 13.1 seconds | 9.5 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.1 | 4.5 - 8.2 | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Qashqai. On average, a Mitsubishi ASX with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Nissan Qashqai. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi ASX is 4 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1513 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi ASX has 9 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The Nissan Qashqai may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 294 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`920 | ~ 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
| |