Mitsubishi ASX 2010 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 - 150 HP | 103 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 - 300 NM | 156 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 13.1 seconds | 9.5 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.1 | 4.5 - 8.2 | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Qashqai. On average, a Mitsubishi ASX with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Nissan Qashqai. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi ASX is 4 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1219 litres | 1513 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`920 kg | ~ 1`985 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`385 kg | ~ 1`453 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 535 kg | ~ 532 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
| |