Mitsubishi ASX 2010 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 - 150 HP | 114 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 - 300 NM | 154 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 13.1 seconds | 10.2 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.1 | 4.6 - 8.1 | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX 2010 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi ASX 2012. On average, Mitsubishi ASX 2010 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX 2012. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.62 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi ASX 2010 and Mitsubishi ASX 2012 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 442 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX 2012 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX 2010 has 23 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX 2012. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`920 | ~ 2`005 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |