Mitsubishi ASX 2010 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.7 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 117 - 150 HP | 112 - 175 HP | |
Torque: | 154 - 300 NM | 184 - 305 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 13.1 seconds | 10.3 - 16.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 8.1 | 6.9 - 10.0 | |
Mitsubishi ASX petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Tucson. On average, Mitsubishi ASX equipped with diesel engines consume 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.30 m | 4.32 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.62 m | 1.72 m | |
Mitsubishi ASX is smaller. Mitsubishi ASX is 3 cm shorter than the Hyundai Tucson, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi ASX is 10 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 644 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1219 litres | 1856 litres | |
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Mitsubishi ASX has 225 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Tucson (by 637 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi ASX is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`920 | ~ 2`171 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | high | below average | |
Average price (€): | 6000 | 3400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi ASX has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |