Mini Countryman 2010 vs BMW X1 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is a more dynamic driving. Mini Countryman engine produces 86 HP less power than BMW X1, whereas torque is 117 NM less than BMW X1. Due to the lower power, Mini Countryman reaches 100 km/h speed 6.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.7 | |
|
The Mini Countryman is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mini Countryman consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1, which means that by driving the Mini Countryman over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| BMW X1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
BMW X1 2009: BMW xDrive is a proactive all-wheel drive system without a center differential that engages before the vehicle becomes unstable, unnoticed by the driver. Torque is distributed between the axles via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch located in the transfer case. Most of the time, the clutch is partially locked and power is transferred to both axles in a 40/60 front/rear ratio, but the system is capable of sending 100% of the torque to either axle. At high speeds or when parking, for example, the clutch is disengaged and all power is sent to the rear wheels. DSC (Dynamic Stability Control) also brakes the wheels individually to regain traction and assist in cornering. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mini Countryman engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X1 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X1 2011 2.0 engine: Until 2015, engines used to have problems with the timing chain guides, which have been resolved over time. Other problems with this engine are the oil pump performance and its drive chain, as well as cracking ... More about BMW X1 2011 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Mini Countryman is smaller, but slightly higher. Mini Countryman is 36 cm shorter than the BMW X1, width is practically the same , while the height of Mini Countryman is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1170 litres | 1350 litres | |
|
BMW X1 has more luggage space. Mini Countryman has 70 litres less trunk space than the BMW X1. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X1 (by 180 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Countryman is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW X1. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`665 | 2`125 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mini Countryman has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for BMW X1, so Mini Countryman quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Countryman has
|
BMW X1 has
| |