Mini Countryman 2012 vs Mini Cooper 2010
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Mini Countryman is more dynamic to drive. Mini Countryman engine produces 96 HP more power than Mini Cooper, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Mini Cooper. Thanks to more power Mini Countryman reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mini Cooper is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mini Countryman consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mini Countryman could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mini Countryman consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 480 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Mini Cooper gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 149 mm (5.9 inches) | 139 mm (5.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mini Countryman can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.13 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Mini Countryman is larger. Mini Countryman is 41 cm longer than the Mini Cooper, 11 cm wider, while the height of Mini Countryman is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 160 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1170 litres | 680 litres | |
|
Mini Countryman has more luggage capacity. Mini Countryman has 190 litres more trunk space than the Mini Cooper. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mini Countryman (by 490 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Countryman is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mini Cooper, which means Mini Countryman can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`915 | 1`525 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Mini Countryman has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mini Cooper has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mini Countryman, so Mini Countryman quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Countryman has
|
Mini Cooper has
| |