Mini Countryman 2010 vs Chevrolet Trax 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Mini Countryman is more dynamic to drive. Mini Countryman engine produces 44 HP more power than Chevrolet Trax, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Chevrolet Trax. Thanks to more power Mini Countryman reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Trax is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mini Countryman consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mini Countryman could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mini Countryman consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 480 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Trax gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Trax engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mini Cooper S | Used also on Chevrolet Cruze | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Trax might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.67 m | |
| Mini Countryman is 15 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Trax, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mini Countryman is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1170 litres | no data | |
| Mini Countryman has 6 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Countryman is 0.7 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Trax, which means Mini Countryman can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`865 | 1`884 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Chevrolet Trax scores higher in safety tests. The Chevrolet Trax scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Countryman has
|
Chevrolet Trax has
| |