Mini Countryman 2010 vs Mini Cooper 2010
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Mini Countryman is more dynamic to drive. Mini Countryman engine produces 62 HP more power than Mini Cooper, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Mini Cooper. Thanks to more power Mini Countryman reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mini Cooper is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mini Countryman consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mini Countryman could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mini Countryman consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Mini Countryman gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 149 mm (5.9 inches) | 139 mm (5.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mini Countryman can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mini Countryman version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from six 4x4 versions of Mini Countryman 2010 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Mini Countryman is larger. Mini Countryman is 37 cm longer than the Mini Cooper, 11 cm wider, while the height of Mini Countryman is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 160 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1170 litres | 680 litres | |
|
Mini Countryman has more luggage capacity. Mini Countryman has 190 litres more trunk space than the Mini Cooper. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mini Countryman (by 490 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Countryman is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mini Cooper, which means Mini Countryman can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`805 | 1`565 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Mini Countryman has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mini Cooper has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mini Countryman, so Mini Countryman quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Countryman has
|
Mini Cooper has
| |