Mini Countryman 2010 vs Renault Captur 2012

 
Mini Countryman
2010 - 2014
Renault Captur
2012 - 2017
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.5 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 112 HP90 HP
Torque: 270 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.6 seconds13.1 seconds
Mini Countryman is more dynamic to drive.
Mini Countryman engine produces 22 HP more power than Renault Captur, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Renault Captur. Thanks to more power Mini Countryman reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.93.7
Real fuel consumption: 6.0 l/100km5.1 l/100km
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mini Countryman consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mini Countryman could require 180 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mini Countryman consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur.
Fuel tank capacity: 47 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 950 km in combined cycle1210 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway1320 km on highway
780 km with real consumption880 km with real consumption
Renault Captur gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Ground clearance: 149 mm (5.9 inches)170 mm (6.7 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Captur can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Captur version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Engines

Engine production duration: 7 years8 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mini CooperInstalled on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Captur might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Mini Countryman engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.10 m4.12 m
Width: 1.79 m1.78 m
Height: 1.56 m1.57 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mini Countryman is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Captur, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mini Countryman is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 350 litres377 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1170 litres1235 litres
Renault Captur has more luggage space.
Mini Countryman has 27 litres less trunk space than the Renault Captur. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Captur (by 65 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mini Countryman is 1.2 metres more than that of the Renault Captur, which means Mini Countryman can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8501`749
Safety:
The Renault Captur scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
above average

above average
Renault Captur has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mini Countryman, so Renault Captur quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 86008000
Pros and Cons: Mini Countryman has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
Renault Captur has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv