Mini Countryman 2010 vs Peugeot 3008 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Mini Countryman is more dynamic to drive. Mini Countryman engine produces 2 HP more power than Peugeot 3008, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Peugeot 3008. Thanks to more power Mini Countryman reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mini Countryman consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 3008, which means that by driving the Mini Countryman over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mini Countryman consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 3008. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 3008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mini Cooper | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 3008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Mini Countryman is smaller. Mini Countryman is 17 cm shorter than the Peugeot 3008, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mini Countryman is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1170 litres | 1604 litres | |
|
Peugeot 3008 has more luggage space. Mini Countryman has 82 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 3008. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 3008 (by 434 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Countryman is 0.6 metres more than that of the Peugeot 3008, which means Mini Countryman can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Peugeot 3008 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Countryman has
|
Peugeot 3008 has
| |