Mini Countryman 2010 vs BMW X1 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is a more dynamic driving. Mini Countryman engine produces 92 HP less power than BMW X1, whereas torque is 130 NM less than BMW X1. Due to the lower power, Mini Countryman reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mini Countryman is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mini Countryman consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1, which means that by driving the Mini Countryman over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mini Countryman consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
BMW X1 2009: BMW xDrive is a proactive all-wheel drive system without a center differential that engages before the vehicle becomes unstable, unnoticed by the driver. Torque is distributed between the axles via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch located in the transfer case. Most of the time, the clutch is partially locked and power is transferred to both axles in a 40/60 front/rear ratio, but the system is capable of sending 100% of the torque to either axle. At high speeds or when parking, for example, the clutch is disengaged and all power is sent to the rear wheels. DSC (Dynamic Stability Control) also brakes the wheels individually to regain traction and assist in cornering. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mini Cooper | Used also on BMW 1 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X1 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X1 2009 2.0 engine: The BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100 000 km. In addition, the engine has to be removed from the car to replace ... More about BMW X1 2009 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Mini Countryman is smaller, but slightly higher. Mini Countryman is 36 cm shorter than the BMW X1, width is practically the same , while the height of Mini Countryman is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1170 litres | 1350 litres | |
|
BMW X1 has more luggage space. Mini Countryman has 70 litres less trunk space than the BMW X1. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X1 (by 180 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Countryman is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW X1. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 2`150 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mini Countryman has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for BMW X1, so Mini Countryman quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Countryman has
|
BMW X1 has
| |