Mini Countryman 2010 vs Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Mini Countryman is more dynamic to drive. Mini Countryman engine produces 22 HP more power than Toyota Urban Cruiser, whereas torque is 28 NM more than Toyota Urban Cruiser. Thanks to more power Mini Countryman reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mini Countryman consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Urban Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mini Countryman could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mini Countryman consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Urban Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 630 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mini Countryman engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mini Cooper | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Yaris, Toyota Verso, Toyota iQ | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Urban Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 1.3 engine: The engine is known for its reliability but exhibits several common issues, especially as mileage increases. Owners report minor oil consumption, which tends to grow over time due to piston ring coking. Individual ignition ... More about Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 3.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Mini Countryman is larger. Mini Countryman is 17 cm longer than the Toyota Urban Cruiser, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mini Countryman is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 314 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1170 litres | no data | |
|
Mini Countryman has more luggage capacity. Mini Countryman has 36 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Urban Cruiser. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`765 | 1`590 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mini Countryman scores higher in safety tests, but Toyota Urban Cruiser is better rated in child safety tests. The Toyota Urban Cruiser scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Countryman has
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
| |