Mini Countryman 2010 vs Peugeot 2008 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Mini Countryman engine produces 2 HP more power than Peugeot 2008, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Mini Countryman reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mini Countryman is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mini Countryman consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mini Countryman could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mini Countryman consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 149 mm (5.9 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Peugeot 2008 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Peugeot 2008 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mini Cooper | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Mini Countryman is smaller, but slightly higher. Mini Countryman is 6 cm shorter than the Peugeot 2008, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 360 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1170 litres | no data | |
| Mini Countryman has 10 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Countryman is 1.2 metres more than that of the Peugeot 2008, which means Mini Countryman can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`765 | 1`666 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mini Countryman has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mini Countryman, so Mini Countryman quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Countryman has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |