Mini Countryman 2010 vs Chevrolet Trax 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Trax is a more dynamic driving. Mini Countryman engine produces 18 HP less power than Chevrolet Trax, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Chevrolet Trax. Due to the lower power, Mini Countryman reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Trax is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mini Countryman consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mini Countryman could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mini Countryman consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Trax gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mini Cooper | Used also on Chevrolet Cruze | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chevrolet Trax might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.67 m | |
| Mini Countryman is 15 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Trax, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mini Countryman is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1170 litres | no data | |
| Mini Countryman has 6 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Trax. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Countryman is 0.7 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Trax, which means Mini Countryman can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`765 | 1`884 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Chevrolet Trax scores higher in safety tests. The Chevrolet Trax scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chevrolet Trax has
| |