Mini Countryman 2014 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012

 
Mini Countryman
2014 - 2016
Land Rover Freelander
2012 - 2014
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 122 HP240 HP
Torque: 160 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds8.8 seconds
Land Rover Freelander is a more dynamic driving.
Mini Countryman engine produces 118 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 180 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Due to the lower power, Mini Countryman reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.79.6
The Mini Countryman is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mini Countryman consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Mini Countryman over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 47 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
810 km on highway930 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 330'000 km300'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 7 years8 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mini CooperInstalled on at least 5 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XJ, Jaguar XF
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Freelander might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Mini Countryman engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.10 m4.50 m
Width: 1.79 mno data
Height: 1.56 m1.74 m
Trunk capacity: 350 litres405 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1170 litresno data
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage space.
Mini Countryman has 55 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander.
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Mini Countryman is 0.3 metres more than that of the Land Rover Freelander.
Gross weight (kg): 1`860no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 90008200
Pros and Cons: Mini Countryman has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Land Rover Freelander has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv