Mini Countryman 2014 vs Nissan Juke 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Mini Countryman engine produces 68 HP less power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Nissan Juke. Due to the lower power, Mini Countryman reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.6 | |
|
The Mini Countryman is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mini Countryman consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Mini Countryman over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Mini Countryman gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mini Cooper | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Juke might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mini Countryman engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mini Countryman is 4 cm shorter than the Nissan Juke, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mini Countryman is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1170 litres | no data | |
|
Mini Countryman has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mini Countryman has 99 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The Nissan Juke may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Countryman is 0.9 metres more than that of the Nissan Juke, which means Mini Countryman can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`805 | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Nissan Juke scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mini Countryman has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mini Countryman, so Mini Countryman quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Countryman has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |