Mini Countryman 2014 vs Nissan Juke 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 214 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Mini Countryman engine produces 92 HP less power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Nissan Juke. Due to the lower power, Mini Countryman reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.4 | |
|
The Mini Countryman is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mini Countryman consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Mini Countryman over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mini Cooper | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Juke might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mini Countryman engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mini Countryman is 7 cm shorter than the Nissan Juke, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 207 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1170 litres | 786 litres | |
|
Mini Countryman has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mini Countryman has 143 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The Nissan Juke may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mini Countryman (by 384 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Countryman is 0.9 metres more than that of the Nissan Juke, which means Mini Countryman can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`805 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Mini Countryman has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mini Countryman, so Mini Countryman quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Countryman has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |