Mini Countryman 2014 vs Skoda Yeti 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is a more dynamic driving. Mini Countryman and Skoda Yeti have the same engine power, but Mini Countryman torque is 40 NM less than Skoda Yeti. Mini Countryman reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.8 | |
| Mini Countryman consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Yeti, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mini Countryman could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Yeti gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Yeti engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mini Cooper | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Yeti might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Skoda Yeti 2013 1.4 engine: The engine is prone to increased vibration at idle. The engine is also very demanding on fuel quality. The timing chain has a low life expectancy and must be monitored. Turbine problems are also common. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Mini Countryman is smaller. Mini Countryman is 13 cm shorter than the Skoda Yeti, width is practically the same , while the height of Mini Countryman is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1170 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Yeti has more luggage space. Mini Countryman has 55 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Yeti. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Countryman is 1.3 metres more than that of the Skoda Yeti, which means Mini Countryman can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`805 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Mini Countryman has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Yeti, so Mini Countryman quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |