Mini Countryman 2017 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Mini Countryman is more dynamic to drive. Mini Countryman engine produces 76 HP more power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 95 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Thanks to more power Mini Countryman reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mini Countryman consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mini Countryman could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mini Countryman consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.56 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mini Countryman is 6 cm shorter than the Toyota C-HR, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1390 litres | no data | |
|
Mini Countryman has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Toyota C-HR may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Countryman is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota C-HR, which means Mini Countryman can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`050 kg | 1`865 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`465 kg | 1`390 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 585 kg | 475 kg | |
| Mini Countryman load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem more than Toyota C-HR. Therefore, Mini Countryman is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Countryman has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |