Mini Countryman 2017 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Mini Countryman and Mitsubishi ASX have the same engine power, but Mini Countryman torque is 30 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. Mini Countryman reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.8 | |
|
The Mini Countryman is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mini Countryman consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Mini Countryman over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| Mini Countryman gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.63 m | |
| Mini Countryman is 6 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mini Countryman is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1390 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Mini Countryman has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mini Countryman has 31 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The Mitsubishi ASX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mini Countryman (by 171 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Countryman is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Mini Countryman can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mini Countryman has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 20 000 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Countryman has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |