Mini Countryman 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Mini Countryman and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque have the same engine power, but Mini Countryman torque is 70 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Mini Countryman reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 6.5 | |
|
The Mini Countryman is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mini Countryman consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that by driving the Mini Countryman over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Mini Countryman gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Mini Countryman is smaller. Mini Countryman is 6 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mini Countryman is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1390 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Mini Countryman has 100 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Countryman is 0.1 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Countryman has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |