Mini Countryman 2017 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Mini Countryman is more dynamic to drive. Mini Countryman engine produces 19 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 66 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Thanks to more power Mini Countryman reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.8 | |
|
The Mini Countryman is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mini Countryman consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Mini Countryman over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Mitsubishi ASX 2012 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Mini Countryman is larger, but lower. Mini Countryman and Mitsubishi ASX are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 442 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1390 litres | 1219 litres | |
| Mini Countryman has 8 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mini Countryman (by 171 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Countryman is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Mini Countryman can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`950 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mini Countryman has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 22 200 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Countryman has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |